← All questionsGS4 · 2017 · Ethics Theory ·Unequal Distribution of National Wealth
QUESTION 7(b)
GS4
10 marks

Increased national wealth did not result in equitable distribution of its benefits. It has created only some “enclaves of modernity and prosperity for a small minority at the cost of the majority.” Justify.

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words

What the examiner wants

Justify with evidence and ethics that growth created small prosperous enclaves at the majority's cost.

JustifyGive reasons and evidence that support the statement.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Evidence: wealth concentration, regional gaps, urban–rural divide, informal workers, displacement of tribals by projects≈30 words
  2. 2Causes: jobless growth, crony capitalism, unequal access to education and health, capital-intensive growth≈30 words
  3. 3Ethical lens: distributive justice (Rawls), Gandhi's talisman, Directive Principles (Article 38, 39)≈30 words
  4. 4Corrective: inclusive growth, progressive taxation, welfare and capability building≈30 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

StatementEvidenceCausesEthical analysisRemediesConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Only economic data without ethics
  • No remedies

Draw this

  • Bar chart of wealth share: top 1% vs bottom 50%

Value addition

  • DataThe richest 1% owned over 40% of India's wealth; the bottom 50% about 3%.Oxfam, Survival of the Richest, 2023
  • ThinkerRawls' difference principle: inequalities are just only if they benefit the least advantaged.John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 1971

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.