QUESTION 1
GS2
10 marks
“The local self-government system in India has not proved to be effective instrument of governance.” Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation.
WRITE IN
7 min
150 words
What the examiner wants
Assess whether panchayats and municipalities have worked as instruments of governance and suggest fixes.
Critically examineWeigh the strengths and the weaknesses, then give a balanced verdict.
Demand-wise check
- 1Achievements: 73rd/74th Amendments (1992) gave regular elections, reservation for women, SC/ST; women leaders; decentralised planning in Kerala≈35 words
- 2Failures: weak devolution of funds, functions and functionaries; State Finance Commissions ignored; parallel bodies; proxy 'sarpanch-pati'; poor own revenue; DPCs inactive≈35 words
- 3Improvement: activity mapping, untied funds, property tax reform, capacity building, social audit, e-governance (eGramSwaraj), empowered mayors≈35 words
Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.
Answer plan
Constitutional frameworkSuccessesFailures (3Fs)MeasuresConclusion
Where marks usually go
- Only the 'not effective' side without successes
- Not separating rural and urban bodies
Draw this
- 3F (funds, functions, functionaries) gap table
Value addition
- Report2nd ARC 6th Report 'Local Governance' (2007) urged clear activity mapping and stronger local finances.2nd ARC, 2007
- ExampleKerala's People's Plan Campaign (1996) devolved about 35–40% of state plan funds to local bodies.Kerala, 1996
- CaseVikas Kishanrao Gawali (2021) laid down the 'triple test' for OBC reservation in local bodies.Supreme Court, 2021
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 7 minutes, then get it checked.