← All questionsGS1 · 2017 · History & Culture ·Fragmented Polity in Mid-18th Century
QUESTION 2
GS1
10 marks

Clarify how mid-eighteenth century India was beset with the spectre of a fragmented polity.

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words

What the examiner wants

Clarify how the decline of Mughal authority by the mid-1700s left India divided among rival powers.

ClarifyAnswer exactly what the question asks.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Mughal decline after 1707: wars of succession, jagirdari crisis, weak emperors, court factions≈20 words
  2. 2Successor states: Hyderabad (Nizam-ul-Mulk, 1724), Bengal (Murshid Quli Khan), Awadh (Saadat Khan); new states: Marathas, Sikh misls, Jats, Rohillas, Mysore≈20 words
  3. 3External blows: Nadir Shah (1739), Ahmad Shah Abdali, Third Battle of Panipat (1761)≈20 words
  4. 4Outcome: no paramount power; Europeans exploit rivalry (Carnatic wars, Plassey 1757)≈20 words
  5. 5Nuance: revisionists see regional vitality, not just chaos≈20 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

Mughal declineRegional and new statesForeign invasionsEuropean openingNuanceConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Only listing states without showing the fragmentation logic
  • Ignoring the 'dark age vs regional vitality' debate

Draw this

  • Map of India c. 1750 showing successor and new states

Value addition

  • EventNadir Shah's 1739 sack of Delhi took away the Peacock Throne and exposed Mughal weakness.Historical record
  • ThinkerMuzaffar Alam argued the 18th century saw regional consolidation, not mere collapse.Muzaffar Alam, The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India, 1986

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.