← All questionsGS4 · 2017 · Case Studies — Private Sector ·Accident Witness vs Business Deal (Case)
QUESTION 12
GS4
20 marks

You are the manager of a spare parts company A and you have to negotiate a deal with the manager of a large manufacturing company B. The deal is highly competitive and sealing the deal is critical for your company. The deal is being worked out over a dinner. After dinner the manager of manufacturing company B offered to drop you to the hotel in his car. On the way to hotel he happens to hit motorcycle injuring the motorcyclist badly. You know the manager was driving fast and thus lost control. The law enforcement officer comes to investigate the issue and you are the sole eyewitness to it. Knowing the strict laws pertaining to road accidents you are aware that your honest account of the incident would lead to the prosecution of the manager and as a consequence the deal is likely to be jeopardised, which is of immense importance to your company. What are the dilemmas you face? What will be your response to the situation?

WRITE IN
14 min
250 words

What the examiner wants

Identify your dilemmas as the sole witness to a business partner's accident and decide how to respond.

Case studyName the stakeholders and the issues, weigh the options, and say what you would do and why.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Stakeholders: injured motorcyclist and family, the manager, your company and employees, the other company, justice system≈50 words
  2. 2Dilemmas: truth vs business interest, loyalty vs justice, personal gain vs victim's rights, fear of losing jobs≈50 words
  3. 3Options: false statement (saves deal, perjury and injustice); silence (avoids conflict, denies justice); truthful statement (just, risks deal)≈50 words
  4. 4Response: first help the victim (ambulance, police), give a truthful statement, separate business from crime, explain to your management≈50 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

StakeholdersDilemmasOptions with merits/demeritsChosen courseConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Not helping the victim first
  • Treating business loss as a valid reason for lying

Draw this

  • Decision tree: false statement / silence / truthful statement → outcomes for victim, deal, self, justice

Value addition

  • LawGiving false evidence is punishable (IPC 191/193, now BNS Sections 227/229).Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • LawSection 134A of the Motor Vehicles Act protects Good Samaritans who help accident victims.MV (Amendment) Act, 2019

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.