← All questionsGS1 · 2017 · History & Culture ·Why the Moderates Lost Conviction
QUESTION 3
GS1
10 marks

Why did the ‘Moderates’ fail to carry conviction with the nation about their proclaimed ideology and political goals by the end of the nineteenth century?

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words

What the examiner wants

Explain why the Moderates' ideology and goals failed to win popular conviction by the 1890s.

WhyAnswer exactly what the question asks.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Ideology: faith in British justice, constitutional methods (petitions, resolutions), gradual self-government within Empire≈30 words
  2. 2Failures: narrow urban educated base, no mass mobilisation, meagre gains (Indian Councils Act 1892), repeated rejection of demands≈30 words
  3. 3Context: famines and plague (1896–97), repressive measures, rise of Extremists (Tilak, Aurobindo) calling it 'mendicancy'≈30 words
  4. 4Balance: economic critique (drain theory), political education, groundwork for nationalism≈30 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

Moderate ideology and goalsWhy they failed to convinceRise of criticsTheir real contributionConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Writing only achievements of the Moderates
  • Drifting into the 1907 Surat split instead of the end-19th-century context

Draw this

  • Two columns: Moderate method → public perception

Value addition

  • CritiqueAurobindo's 'New Lamps for Old' articles (Indu Prakash, 1893–94) attacked the Congress as unrepresentative and timid.Indu Prakash, 1893–94
  • ThinkerDadabhai Naoroji's drain theory, later in 'Poverty and Un-British Rule in India' (1901), was the Moderates' strongest economic critique.Dadabhai Naoroji

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.