← All questionsGS2 · 2017 · Social Justice ·101st Amendment and GST Efficacy
QUESTION 11
GS2
15 marks

Explain the salient features of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. Do you think it is efficacious enough “to remove cascading effect of taxes and provide for common national market for goods and services”?

WRITE IN
11 min
250 words

What the examiner wants

Explain the 101st Amendment's features and judge whether GST removed cascading and built a national market.

Explain + Do you thinkMake clear how and why it happens: causes, process, and an example for each point.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Features: Article 246A (concurrent taxing power), 269A (IGST on inter-state supply), 279A (GST Council), compensation to states for five years, subsumed central and state taxes, entry changes in Seventh Schedule≈50 words
  2. 2Successes: input tax credit across chain, removal of check posts, e-way bill, wider tax base≈50 words
  3. 3Limits: petroleum, alcohol, electricity and real estate outside GST (cascading remains), multiple rates, inverted duty, compliance burden on MSMEs, Centre-state trust issues≈50 words
  4. 4View: largely effective; needs fuel inclusion and simpler rates≈50 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

FeaturesHow it removes cascadingNational market gainsShortcomingsConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Explaining GST generally without the Amendment's articles
  • No balanced judgment on 'efficacious enough'

Draw this

  • Flowchart showing input tax credit removing tax on tax

Value addition

  • CaseUnion v Mohit Minerals (2022): GST Council recommendations are persuasive, not binding.Supreme Court, 2022
  • Reform'GST 2.0' (September 2025) cut most goods to two main slabs of 5% and 18%.GST Council, 2025

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.