← All questionsGS4 · 2019 · Case Studies — Public Sector ·Politicisation of Bureaucracy (Case)
QUESTION 10
GS4
20 marks

In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive. Elected people’s representatives forms the political executive and bureaucracy form the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executives and the political executives were characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other’s domain. However, in subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executives to follow its agenda. Respect for an appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards ‘politicization of bureaucracy’. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life has also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive. What are the consequences of this ‘politicization of bureaucracy? Discuss.

WRITE IN
14 min
250 words

What the examiner wants

Discuss the consequences of politicisation of the bureaucracy.

Case studyName the stakeholders and the issues, weigh the options, and say what you would do and why.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Causes (as given): political interference, pressure, disrespect for upright officers, materialism≈50 words
  2. 2Consequences: loss of neutrality, frequent transfers, corruption, policy capture, demoralisation, poor delivery, erosion of trust≈50 words
  3. 3Remedies: Civil Services Boards, fixed tenure, code of ethics, protection for honest officers≈50 words
  4. 4Example≈50 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

ContextConsequencesRemediesConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Only causes
  • No remedy

Draw this

  • Flow: interference → loss of neutrality → poor governance

Value addition

  • CaseT.S.R. Subramanian (2013): Civil Services Boards and minimum tenure; oral orders to be recorded.Supreme Court, 2013
  • ExampleAshok Khemka's 50+ transfers in his career are often cited as a case of punishment transfers.Media reports

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.