Vinod is an honest and sincere IAS officer. Recently, he has taken over as Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation, his sixth transfer in the past three years. His peers acknowledge his vast knowledge affability and uprightness. The Chairman of the State Road Transport Corporation is a powerful politician and is very close to the Chief Minister. Vinod comes to know about many alleged irregularities of the Corporation and the high-handedness of the Chairman in financial matters. A Board Member of the Corporation belonging to the Opposition Party meets Vinod and hands over a few documents along with a video recording in which the Chairman appears to be demanding bribe for placing a huge order for the supply of QMR tyres. Vinod recollects the Chairman expediting the clearing of pending bills of QMR tyres. Vinod confronts the Board Member as to why he is shying away from exposing the Chairman with the so-called solid proof he has with him. The members inform him that the Chairman refuses to yield to his threats. He adds that Vinod may earn recognition and public support if he himself exposes the Chairman. Further, he tells Vinod that once his party comes to power, Vinod’s professional growth would be assured. Vinod is aware that he may be penalised if he exposes the Chairman and may further be transferred to a distant place. He knows that Opposition Party stands a better chance of coming to power in the forthcoming elections. However, he also realises that the Board Member is trying to use him for his own political gains. (a): As a conscientious civil servant, evaluate the options available to Vinod. (b): In the light of the above case, comment upon the ethical issues that may arise due to the politicization of bureaucracy.
What the examiner wants
Vinod, an honest MD, receives evidence of the Chairman's bribery from an Opposition Board member who wants to use him politically. Evaluate his options and comment on politicisation of the bureaucracy.
Demand-wise check
- 1(a) Options: ignore; leak to media as the member wants; verify and report through official channels (Chief Secretary, vigilance, CVC/state ACB); confront the Chairman≈65 words
- 2Best: verify documents, record the pending bills issue, report to vigilance/anti-corruption bodies through proper channels; stay politically neutral; refuse the promise of reward≈65 words
- 3(b) Politicisation: loss of neutrality, transfers as punishment, officers aligning with parties, policy capture, loss of public trust≈65 words
Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.
Answer plan
Where marks usually go
- Choosing to go to the media, which breaks service conduct rules
- Leaving sub-part (b) thin
Draw this
- Option table with neutrality and legality columns
Value addition
- CaseT.S.R. Subramanian v Union of India (2013): Supreme Court asked for Civil Services Boards and fixed minimum tenure to curb arbitrary transfers.Supreme Court of India
- RuleAll India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 require political neutrality and bar unauthorised communication to the press.AIS (Conduct) Rules, 1968
Mapped topper copies
Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.
- Shakti Dubey · AIR 1 · Page 37 ↗Same syllabus reference
- Aakash Garg · AIR 5 · Page 39 ↗Same syllabus reference
- Shakti Dubey · AIR 1 · Page 35 ↗Same syllabus reference
- Shakti Dubey · AIR 1 · Page 33 ↗Same syllabus reference
Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 14 minutes, then get it checked.