QUESTION 5
GS2
10 marks
‘Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker’! Do you think this practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India?
WRITE IN
7 min
150 words
What the examiner wants
Decide whether India should follow the UK convention of Speakers giving up party politics, and what it would mean for Parliament.
CommentGive your own view on the statement and back it with facts and examples.
Demand-wise check
- 1UK practice: Speaker resigns from party, re-elected unopposed, does not return to party politics≈30 words
- 2Why for India: Speaker's role in anti-defection cases, money bill certification, neutrality concerns≈30 words
- 3Implications: more trust and smooth functioning; but practical issues (party tickets, career)≈30 words
- 4Alternatives: tribunal for disqualification cases, fixed timelines≈30 words
Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.
Answer plan
UK conventionIndian concernsFor and against adoptionImplicationsConclusion
Where marks usually go
- Not addressing implications for parliamentary business
- No Indian case, e.g. Kihoto Hollohan or Manipur Speaker's delayed defection ruling (2020)
Draw this
- Table: UK vs India Speaker conventions
Value addition
- CaseKeisham Meghachandra Singh v Speaker, Manipur (2020): the Supreme Court said disqualification petitions should be decided within three months and suggested an independent tribunal.Supreme Court, 2020
- FactThe office of Deputy Speaker of the 17th Lok Sabha remained vacant for its whole term (2019–24).Lok Sabha records
Mapped topper copies
Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.
- Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · Page 17 ↗Reviewed PYQ reference
- Shakti Dubey · AIR 1 · Page 3 ↗Reviewed PYQ reference
Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 7 minutes, then get it checked.