← All questionsGS2 · 2014 · Polity & Constitution ·Indian Federalism's Centralising Tilt
MAINS 2014
GS2
12.5 marks

Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features, it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre, a feature that militates against the concept of strong federalism. Discuss.

WRITE IN
9 min
200 words

What the examiner wants

Discuss whether the strong-Centre bias of Indian federalism undermines its federal character.

DiscussExplain the different sides of the issue, use evidence, and finish with a balanced view.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Federal features: dual polity, division of powers (Seventh Schedule), written rigid constitution, independent judiciary, bicameralism; federalism a basic feature≈35 words
  2. 2Centralising features: Art 3 (reorganise states), residuary powers (Art 248), Art 249, 250, 252, 356, Governor's role, All India Services, single citizenship, emergency provisions, fiscal dependence≈35 words
  3. 3Justification: partition context, integration of princely states, diversity, security≈35 words
  4. 4Evolving balance: Bommai limits on Art 356, finance commissions, GST Council, cooperative and competitive federalism≈35 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

Federal featuresUnitary tilt with articlesReasons for tiltJudicial and institutional checksConclusion: 'holding together' federation

Where marks usually go

  • Listing articles without addressing whether the tilt 'militates against' federalism
  • No commission or case reference

Draw this

  • Balance scale: federal features vs unitary features

Value addition

  • ThinkerK.C. Wheare called India 'quasi-federal'; Ambedkar said the Constitution can be both unitary and federal according to the needs of time.Wheare; Constituent Assembly
  • CaseS.R. Bommai v Union of India (1994): federalism is a basic feature; Art 356 proclamations are subject to judicial review.Supreme Court, 1994
  • CommitteeSarkaria Commission (1988) and Punchhi Commission (2010) recommended sparing use of Art 356 and consultation with states.Government of India

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.