← All questionsGS4 · 2021 · Case Studies — Individual Morality ·Unfair Means and Promotion Pressure (Case)
QUESTION 8
GS4
20 marks

You are Vice Principal of a degree college in one of the middle–class towns. The principal has recently retired and management is looking for his replacement. There are also feelers that the management may promote you as Principal. In the meantime, during annual examination, the flying squad came from the university caught two students red-handed involving in unfair means. A senior lecturer of the college was personally helping these student in this act. This senior lecturer also happens to be close to the management. One of the students was son of a local politician who was responsible in getting college affiliated to the present reputed university. The second student was son of a local businessman who has donated maximum funds for running of the college. You immediately informed the management regarding this unfortunate incident. The management told you to resolve the issue with flying squad at any cost. They further said that such an incident will not only tarnish the image of the college but also the politician and businessmen are very important personalities for the functioning of the college. You were also given hint that your further promotion to Principal depends on your capability in resolving this issue with flying squad. In the meantime, you were intimated by your administrative officer that certain members of the student union are protesting outside the college gate against the senior lecturer and the students involved in this incident and demanding strict action against defaulters.1) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.2) Critically examine the options available with you as Vice Principal. What option will you adopt and why?

WRITE IN
14 min
250 words

What the examiner wants

As Vice Principal, you are pressured to protect influential students caught cheating with a lecturer's help, with your promotion at stake. Identify issues and decide.

Case studyName the stakeholders and the issues, weigh the options, and say what you would do and why.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1(a) Issues: academic integrity, conflict of interest, abuse of influence, fairness to other students, career vs duty≈65 words
  2. 2(b) Options: settle with the flying squad; stay silent; let the university process take its course and act against the lecturer; talk to management and students≈65 words
  3. 3Choice: support the flying squad's report, recommend action against the lecturer, communicate with students to calm protests, refuse to compromise even at the cost of promotion≈65 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

Facts(a) issues(b) options and evaluationDecisionConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Choosing to 'manage' the flying squad
  • Ignoring the lecturer's role

Draw this

  • Stakeholder map: students, lecturer, management, protesters, you

Value addition

  • LawPublic Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 punishes organised cheating with 3–10 years in prison, showing how seriously exam integrity is treated.Public Examinations Act, 2024
  • ThinkerKant: treat persons as ends — honest students' effort must not be devalued.Immanuel Kant

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.