← All questionsGS4 · 2015 · Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude ·Why Anti-Corruption Measures Fail
QUESTION 6
GS4
10 marks

Despite codes of conduct, vigilance cells and commissions, RTI, active media and stronger legal mechanisms, corrupt practices are not coming under control. Evaluate the effectiveness of these measures and suggest more effective strategies to tackle corruption.

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words

What the examiner wants

Evaluate why codes, vigilance bodies, RTI, media and laws have not controlled corruption and suggest better strategies.

Evaluate + SuggestWeigh what works and what does not, and say how far it succeeds. Propose specific, workable measures.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1Evaluation: codes lack enforcement; vigilance under-staffed and slow; RTI exposure without punishment; media sensational; low conviction rates≈30 words
  2. 2Root causes: discretion, complex rules, political funding, weak whistleblower protection, social tolerance≈30 words
  3. 3Better strategies: reduce discretion (e-governance, DBT, e-procurement), Lokpal effectiveness, asset audits, social audit, whistleblower protection, ethics education≈30 words
  4. 4Ethical culture: leadership by example≈30 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

Measures listedEffectiveness evaluatedRoot causesNew strategiesConclusion

Where marks usually go

  • Repeating existing measures as 'suggestions'
  • No data on corruption levels

Draw this

  • Table: measure → why it fails → fix

Value addition

  • DataIndia ranked 96 of 180 with a score of 38 in Transparency International's CPI 2024.Transparency International, 2025
  • CommitteeSanthanam Committee (1964) led to creation of the Central Vigilance Commission.Santhanam Committee, 1964

Mapped topper copies

Reviewed public-source references related to this PYQ. Same-syllabus references are labelled separately.

Links open original public sources. MainsBuddy does not host these answer sheets.