← All questionsGS1 · 2013 · History ·Wars after Independence
QUESTION N09
GS1
10 marks

Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.

WRITE IN
7 min
200 words
☆ Save✎ Write this answer

What the examiner wants

Analyze the exact proposition in the PYQ — “Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.” — using concept/chronology or mechanism, evidence on both sides where relevant, and a conclusion that answers the directive rather than merely describing Wars after Independence.

Analyze · DiscussAnswer exactly what the question asks.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1For the prompt cue ‘Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.’, directly answer: Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966≈45 words
  2. 2For the prompt cue ‘Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.’, directly answer: Discuss the highlights of the agreement≈45 words
  3. 3For the prompt cue ‘Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.’, add one verified official-source anchor and a limitation/counterpoint specific to Wars after Independence≈45 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

Define/contextualise Wars after IndependenceExplain mechanism/chronologyQuestion-specific evidence/examplesImplicationsConcise conclusion

Where marks usually go

  • For the prompt cue ‘Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.’, avoid a generic note on Wars after Independence; answer the actual wording/directive and the Wars after Independence proposition
  • For the prompt cue ‘Analyze the circumstances that led to Tashkent Agreement in 1966. Discuss the highlights of the agreement.’, do not add examples around Wars after Independence unless they prove, qualify or rebut the proposition asked

Value addition

  • Mini timeline or cause→event→consequence chain
    → Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.

Official source anchors

These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.