QUESTION PYQ 03
GS4
10 marks
Differentiate ‘moral intuition” from ‘moral reasoning’ with suitable examples.
WRITE IN
7 min
150 words
What the examiner wants
For Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable Examples, the core task is to discuss the exact proposition ‘Differentiate ‘moral intuition” from ‘moral reasoning’ with suitable examples.’. Organise the answer around its qualifier and evidence burden, not around a generic syllabus note.
DiscussExplain the different sides of the issue, use evidence, and finish with a balanced view.
Demand-wise check
- 1Differentiate ‘moral intuition” from ‘moral reasoning’ with suitable examples≈55 words
- 2For Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable Examples, identify the competing values, apply them to public conduct and use a concrete illustration rather than abstract moralising≈55 words
Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.
Answer plan
Interpret/define Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable ExamplesCore ethical principleCompeting value or limitPublic-service applicationConcrete examplePrincipled conclusion
Where marks usually go
- Turning this into a broad note on Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable Examples instead of answering the question’s operative wording: ‘Differentiate ‘moral intuition” from ‘moral reasoning’ with suitable examples.’
- Missing the evidence burden: this PYQ explicitly asks for examples/cases, so generic assertions on Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable Examples cannot carry the answer
Value addition
- Differentiate Moral Intuition Moral Reasoning Suitable Examples: ethical balance triangle — principle → competing value → public-interest resolution
→ Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.
Verified value additions
These are verified official-source additions selected for this exact PYQ. Use only the point that strengthens your argument.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 7 minutes, then get it checked.