Comment on the National Wetland Conservation Programme initiated by the Government of India and name a few India’s wetlands of international importance included in the Ramsar Sites.
What the examiner wants
For Wetland Conservation, the core task is to comment the exact proposition ‘Comment on the National Wetland Conservation Programme initiated by the Government of India and name a few India’s wetlands of international importance…’. Organise the answer around its qualifier and evidence burden, not around a generic syllabus note.
Demand-wise check
- 1Comment on the National Wetland Conservation Programme initiated by the Government of India and name a few India’s wetlands of international importance included in the Ramsar Sites≈65 words
- 2For Wetland Conservation, separate hazard/driver from exposure or vulnerability and then link the response directly to that causal chain≈65 words
- 3Use at least two question-relevant examples/evidence points to support the final judgment on Wetland Conservation, proportionate to a 250-word answer≈65 words
Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.
Answer plan
Where marks usually go
- Turning this into a broad note on Wetland Conservation instead of answering the question’s critical balance: ‘Comment on the National Wetland Conservation Programme initiated by the Government of India and name a…’
- Giving only one side on Wetland Conservation; the directive requires a limitation, counter-view or implementation test before the final judgment
Value addition
- Wetland Conservation: risk chain — driver/hazard → exposure → impact → mitigation/resilience
→ Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.
Official source anchors
These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 11 minutes, then get it checked.