← All questionsGS4 · 2015 · Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude ·Ethics Theory
QUESTION 2(a)
GS4
10 marks

The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words
☆ Save✎ Write this answer

What the examiner wants

Discuss the exact proposition in the PYQ — “The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.” — using concept/chronology or mechanism, evidence on both sides where relevant, and a conclusion that answers the directive rather than merely describing Ethics Theory.

DiscussExplain the different sides of the issue, use evidence, and finish with a balanced view.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1For the prompt cue ‘The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.’, directly answer: The weak can never forgive≈35 words
  2. 2For the prompt cue ‘The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.’, directly answer: forgiveness is the attribute of the strong≈35 words
  3. 3For the prompt cue ‘The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.’, directly answer: Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement≈35 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

Define/contextualise Ethics TheoryExplain mechanism/chronologyQuestion-specific evidence/examplesImplicationsConcise conclusion

Where marks usually go

  • For the prompt cue ‘The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.’, avoid a generic note on Ethics Theory; answer the actual wording/directive and the Ethics Theory proposition
  • For the prompt cue ‘The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. Discuss the ethical meaning of this statement.’, do not add examples around Ethics Theory unless they prove, qualify or rebut the proposition asked

Value addition

  • 3-box flow: concept/context → core argument/evidence → implication/way forward
    → Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.

Official source anchors

These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.